Absolutely, here are the key takeaways from the video Changing views - YouTube | Changing Views toward mRNA based Covid Vaccines in the Scientific Literature: 2020 - 2024 by Dr. John Campbell:

• [00:14] の変化 [へんげ] (change) Early scientific literature was biased in favor of promoting mRNA vaccines without any previous completed human clinical trials. This bias was likely due to social and political concerns, as well as corporate greed.

• [01:34] ⬆️ (increase) There has been a dramatic shift in the medical literature concerning mRNA vaccines between 2020 and 2024. Initially, the literature claimed there were no serious adverse events associated with mRNA vaccines. However, as more data became available, the literature began to acknowledge the existence of serious adverse events.

• [02:16] ⚠️ (warning) The early decision-making regarding mRNA vaccines was based on biased reports of the science. This led to the widespread use of mRNA vaccines despite the lack of safety data.

• [02:31] 🌐 (globe) Science should be completely objective when evaluating health risks. However, it can often be influenced by social and economic considerations.

• [03:27] 顕著 けんちょ The COVID-19 pandemic exposed serious vulnerabilities in Western medical research. These vulnerabilities include the susceptibility of science to bias and the influence of corporate greed.
  ░
  http://googleusercontent.com/youtube_content/0

• [04:23] (warning) The author argues that scientific principles were abandoned during the development and rollout of COVID-19 vaccines.

• [05:16] (increase) A review of over 4,000 scientific articles found an increasing acknowledgement of risks and reduced efficacy of mRNA vaccines between 2020 and 2024.

• [05:44] ➡️ (shift) There was a significant shift in scientific literature regarding mRNA vaccines. Early papers claimed no serious adverse events, while later papers acknowledged a significant number.

• [06:25] ⚠️ (warning) The author suggests early decision-making on COVID-19 vaccines was based on biased scientific reports that failed to acknowledge serious adverse events.

• [07:45] (corporation, money) The author claims the objectivity of scientific research on COVID-19 vaccines was compromised by social, political concerns, and overwhelming corporate greed.

• [08:11] ⚠️ (warning) The author warns that social, political concerns, and corporate greed can significantly bias scientific research, especially when evaluating health risks.

• [08:41] ⚖️ (balance) Scientific objectivity is crucial, but research can be influenced by social and economic factors.

• [09:40] (globe) The author suggests that international competition between superpowers like the US, Russia, and China influenced the development of COVID-19 vaccines.

• [10:08] (trophy) The author claims some countries prioritized being the "first" to develop a vaccine over safety and efficacy.

• [11:14] ❓ (question) The video raises the question of why the US heavily invested in mRNA vaccines when established vaccine technologies existed.

• [12:24] (money) The author suggests that economic considerations may have influenced the decision to prioritize mRNA vaccines over established alternatives.

• [13:19] (science tube) The video claims that national rivalries and corporate interests influenced scientific reporting on COVID-19 vaccines.

• [13:42] ➡️ (shift) There was a significant shift in scientific literature on COVID-19 vaccines between 2020 and 2024. Early papers claimed no serious adverse events, while later papers acknowledged a high rate.

• [14:23] ✅ (checkmark) Early scientific literature on COVID-19 vaccines often portrayed them as very safe and positive.

• [15:25] (minimize) Even when acknowledging some serious adverse events, later scientific literature downplayed their frequency with terms like "very rare."

• [17:41] ⚠️ (warning) The video cites a study that found a significant increase in reports of serious adverse events associated with mRNA vaccines.

• [18:10] (increase) The author claims there has been a dramatic shift in the medical literature regarding mRNA vaccines, with a later acknowledgement of serious adverse events.

• [18:43] (money) The author suggests the early positive portrayal of mRNA vaccines in scientific literature may have been influenced by monetary and political purposes.

• [19:29] (conflict) The video criticizes the practice of vaccine producers publishing research promoting their own products, citing conflicts of interest.

• [20:28] (newspaper) The video suggests that even prestigious medical journals may not be immune to bias.

• [20:46] (ban) The video mentions the existence of arguments for completely banning mRNA vaccines until further safety testing is conducted.

• [21:12] (lock) The video calls for more transparency in data regarding mRNA vaccines.

• [21:28] (bomb) The video concludes that the shift in attitudes towards mRNA vaccines exposes serious vulnerabilities in Western medical research.

By definition, these serious adverse events lead to either death,

are life-threatening,

require inpatient (prolongation of) hospitalisation,

cause persistent/significant disability/incapacity,

concern a congenital anomaly/birth defect

or include a medically important event according to medical judgement

Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths

Experts call for more research into side effects and possible links to mortality rates

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024...

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-0...

Competing interests: None declared.

https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/conte...

Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines.

This raises serious concerns.

Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate the underlying causes of persistent excess mortality.

Insight into excess death rates in years following WHO’s pandemic declaration is crucial for government leaders and policymakers to evaluate their health crisis policies.

This study explores excess mortality in the Western World from 2020 until 2022.

Methods

All-cause mortality reports, ‘Our World in Data’

47 western countries

Comparator

Historical death data in a country from 2015 until 2019

Total excess deaths, 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2022

3,098,456 from

Excess mortality 2021, 42 countries (89%)

Excess mortality 2022, 43 countries (91%)

Excess deaths

2020, 1,033,122 excess deaths (P-score 11.4%)

2021, 1,256,942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%)

2022, 808,392 excess deaths (P-score 8.8%)

Conclusions

Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years,

despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines.

This raises serious concerns.

Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality.

More information

The secondary analysis of the placebo-controlled, phase III randomised clinical trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines showed that the Pfizer trial had a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group.

The authors of the secondary analysis point out that most of these serious adverse events concern common clinical conditions, for example, ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome and brain haemorrhage. This commonality hinders clinical suspicion and consequently its detection as adverse vaccine reactions

These reactions included cardiovascular diseases,

coagulation, haemorrhages,

gastrointestinal events and thromboses.

Numerous studies reported that COVID-19 vaccination may induce myocarditis, pericarditis and autoimmune diseases.

Postmortem examinations have also ascribed myocarditis,

encephalitis, immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia,

intracranial haemorrhage and diffuse thrombosis to COVID-19 vaccinations.

pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

• 00:01 🦠 Vitamin D supplementation reduces the incidence of COVID-19.

  • Vitamin D supplementation has a protective effect against COVID-19 in randomized controlled trials.
  • Odds ratio of 0.43 indicates a 60% protective effect.
  • Healthcare workers experienced an 80% reduction in risk with vitamin D supplementation.

• 02:47 📊 Meta-analysis confirms significant association between vitamin D and COVID-19 protection.

  • Meta-analysis concludes a definitive and significant link between vitamin D and reduced COVID-19 incidence.
  • Study titled "Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk for COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" published in February 2024.
  • Consensus on the protective role of vitamin D in both COVID-19 incidence and ICU admissions.

• 03:02 📚 Vitamin D's crucial roles in health and immunity.

  • Vitamin D plays crucial roles in bone health, muscle function, and immune response.
  • Optimizing vitamin D levels may protect against a range of cancers.
  • Strong scientific evidence supports the importance of vitamin D in immune system modulation.

• 04:25 🧪 Understanding the role of vitamin D in immune response.

  • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis highlight vitamin D's impact on the immune response to viruses.
  • Vitamin D supplementation shows a protective role in COVID-19 incidence among a large population.
  • Further research is needed to determine vitamin D's impact on mortality rates.

• 06:28 💡 Mechanisms of vitamin D action in the body.

  • Vitamin D mediates its effects through vitamin D receptors (VDRs) in nucleated cells.
  • VDR activation by vitamin D regulates gene expression crucial for immunity and metabolism.
  • Approximately 3% of the human genome is under the control of activated vitamin D, emphasizing its broad impact on health.

• 08:01 🔬 Vitamin D's role in immune function and disease prevention.

  • Vitamin D contributes to the synthesis of immune proteins and enhances phagocytic activity.
  • Modulates the immune system response by regulating inflammatory cascades, reducing the risk of cytokine storms.
  • Optimizing vitamin D levels may help mitigate pathological reactions to infections.

• 09:34 💊 Immediate benefits of activated vitamin D (calcidiol) supplementation.

  • Activated vitamin D (calcidiol) offers immediate benefits compared to standard vitamin D supplementation.
  • Calcidiol activates within a couple of hours, potentially aiding in combating acute infections.
  • Consideration of calcidiol supplementation for individuals with low vitamin D levels during acute infections is suggested.

• 11:41 ✅ Advocating for vitamin D supplementation in healthcare.

  • Research supports the efficacy of vitamin D in reducing COVID-19 incidence and severity.
  • Urgent consideration for vitamin D supplementation in acute infection cases is recommended.
  • The accessibility and affordability of vitamin D make it a viable option for public health intervention.

• 01:25 🩹 A fourth dose of the COVID vaccine does not provide protection against death, according to a population-wide study in Austria.
• 01:55 🦠 Although the fourth dose initially reduces infections by 177% for the first 3 months, it leads to more infections in the following 6 months, questioning its long-term efficacy.
• 08:53 📉 The extended follow-up until June 2023 shows no significant reduction in mortality with the fourth vaccine dose but indicates a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, raising concerns.
• 09:46 🏥 The observed lower mortality in those with a fourth dose may be attributed to a "healthy vaccine bias," as healthier individuals are more likely to receive additional doses.
• 12:21 🤔 The study questions the justification for repeated vaccine boosters for individuals with a history of previous infections, suggesting a need for a critical re-evaluation of current vaccine policies.

• 00:00 🔍 Conflicting Advice on Natural Immunity

  • Conflicting advice between natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity.
  • World Health Organization's assertion of natural immunity lasting 6 to 8 months, while vaccine-induced immunity substantially reduces after 4 months.
  • Comparison of people vaccinated and unvaccinated but infected, revealing significantly higher protection with natural immunity against infection, symptomatic disease, and hospitalization.

• 03:13 🧬 Comprehensive Evidence on Natural Immunity

  • WHO data indicating robust natural immunity for at least 6 to 8 months post-infection, supported by cellular immunity.
  • Natural infection provides broader immune response targeting various viral proteins, not just the spike protein.
  • Research from the Oxford academic journal highlighting waning protection post two doses of Pfizer vaccine and contrasting the reduction in immunity between vaccinated and naturally infected individuals.

• 06:33 📊 Superiority of Natural Immunity Over Vaccination

  • Studies emphasizing the significant protective advantage of natural acquired immunity against Delta variant infection compared to two-dose vaccine immunity.
  • Instances where unvaccinated individuals previously infected had no subsequent infections, supporting the notion that COVID-19 vaccination might not benefit those who've already had the infection.
  • Criticism towards public health officials and leaders for holding onto the hypothesis that natural immunity is unreliable, despite growing scientific evidence against this notion.

• 09:09 🤝 Rebuilding Trust Through Acknowledgment

  • Emphasis on the loss of public trust due to conflicting messages and the necessity for authorities to admit the potential superiority of natural immunity.
  • Suggestion to rebuild trust by acknowledging the evidence and admitting any errors in the previous understanding of natural immunity.
  • Highlighting the importance of transparency and honesty in adapting to evolving scientific data to regain public confidence.

• 12:43 🌍 Community Health Project in Uganda

  • Conclusion with a heartwarming story about a community health project in Uganda supporting impoverished and abandoned children for their education.
  • Encouragement for viewers to contribute to the community project through donations, stating that over 100% of the funds go directly to support workers in Africa.
  • Highlighting the positive impact viewers' support has on these humanitarian projects.

• 5.1% of those who received the mRNA-1273 booster vaccine in a Swiss trial showed increased troponins, indicating cardiomyocyte damage.
• 2.8% of the vaccinated group (1 in 35 recipients) experienced vaccine-associated myocardial injury.
• The study was industry-independent, peer-reviewed, and conducted by cardiologists and scientists.
• Active surveillance was used, which is more reliable than passive retrospective surveillance.
• Women showed more myocardial damage than men in this study, different from passive surveillance results.
• Patients with elevated troponins were warned not to exercise, resulting in no major adverse cardiac events within 30 days.
• Vaccine-induced myocardial injury was more common than previously thought.
• The potential protective role of antiviral and antibacterial agents warrants further study.
• Regulators around the world need to respond urgently to this information.

• 00:41 The video presents microscopic evidence of spike protein presence in the heart tissue of deceased patients following a specific injection.
• 02:16 The spike protein in the heart tissue is linked to inflammatory changes and abnormal CD4 cell presence, indicating severe damage.
• 04:14 A systematic review of 28 autopsies reveals clear causality between COVID-19 vaccinations and myocarditis.
• 07:16 The study shows that the adverse events related to myocarditis occurred from Day 0 to Day 36 after vaccination, with a higher incidence in young men.
• 09:08 The authors suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccinations and myocarditis in cases of sudden and unexpected death in vaccinated individuals.
• 11:20 Alarmingly, some cases show no reported symptoms before death, and autopsy reveals inflammation in young individuals aged 16 to 17.
• 13:23 The scientific community is open to replies and further investigation, and more information is yet to be revealed on this topic.

The fact (Campbell has reviewed the evidence in previous videos) the mRNA vaccine can travel from the vaccination site throughout the body is something I find horrific. And here he explains why it can be such a serious problem, especially for those with narrowing arteries in the heart and other vital areas. Scary stuff.

• 🦠 mRNA vaccine for influenza is being discussed in the video.
• 🩸 Lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine can potentially be distributed throughout the body.
• 🔬 The vaccine's lipid nanoparticles can merge with cell membranes and deliver RNA instructions.
• 🌡️ The vaccine stimulates an immune response and an inflammatory response.
• 💪 Immune cells produce antibodies to protect against disease.
• 💉 Systemic absorption of the vaccine and antigen production may vary based on the number of cells reached.
• ⚖️ Controlling the dose of antigen produced and monitoring systemic inflammation is a concern.
• 🌍 The video questions why vaccine manufacturers haven't taken these concerns into account.
• 🌐 Governments around the world are investing in mRNA vaccine production with companies like Moderna and Oxford.
• ❓ The video calls for answers regarding the potential systemic distribution and inflammatory effects of the vaccine.
• 🎥 A follow-up video is mentioned for explaining the proposed details by the National Institutes of Health.

• [🎥] The video is a UK parliamentary debate on the New World Health Organization treaty and its potential impact on the sovereignty of nations and individuals.
• [🏛️] The debate was initiated by a petition signed by over 156,000 people, including 295 constituents of Esther McVey.
• [🤝] Esther McVey is a Member of Parliament and co-chair of the APPG on Pandemic Response and Recovery.
• [🧑‍💼] McVey and other critics argue that the treaty could transfer power away from sovereign and democratically elected nations and into the hands of the WHO, an unelected and largely privately funded bureaucracy.
• [🗣️] Some of the concerns raised include changes in language that make certain aspects of the treaty binding rather than non-binding, and the fact that the WHO has extended the Public Health Emergency of International Concern every six months since January 2020.
• [📊] McVey and other members of the APPG have heard from renowned experts advocating for evidence-based proportional measures to prevent avoidable suffering and loss, and welcome open discussions and analysis on the impact and effects of lockdowns.

German lab's frightening results. Found evidence of covid vaccine causing strange,new pathology. More work needs to be done, but unlikely that will happen in U.S. or U.K. where questioning the safety of vaccine is not allowed.

Another vaccine induced death. Wonder if youtube will force publisher to take this video down, too.

This is very concerning. The lipid nano particles that contain the mRNA in the vaccine are found everywhere in the body. So they are spreading from the vaccination site. We were told this would not happen. We were told the nano particles degrades at the vaccination site. But it does not. What trouble can that cause.

They did not investigate that question.

Presumably because they, the vaccine makers, were afraid of the answers.

In fact, there is no degradation data. No one investigated how long the vaccine lasted--though we were told otherwise.

Jeez!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8kaXrEQB5M

Aspiration during vaccine administration.